Kommentare zu: Ubiquitous Microblogging http://thingthatthinks.com/2009/09/ubiquitous-microblogging/ Martin Böhringer's Blog Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:46:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 Von: Akibot: Enterprise Microblogging with NLP : Beyond Search http://thingthatthinks.com/2009/09/ubiquitous-microblogging/#comment-5842 Akibot: Enterprise Microblogging with NLP : Beyond Search Wed, 07 Apr 2010 06:20:42 +0000 http://thingthatthinks.com/?p=214#comment-5842 [...] The story “Yet Another New Version” pointed to an article about Akibot by Martin Bohringer, “Ubiquitous Microblogging”. He wrote: The approach of ubiquitous microblogging has much to do with the search for [...] [...] The story “Yet Another New Version” pointed to an article about Akibot by Martin Bohringer, “Ubiquitous Microblogging”. He wrote: The approach of ubiquitous microblogging has much to do with the search for [...]

]]> Von: martin http://thingthatthinks.com/2009/09/ubiquitous-microblogging/#comment-2541 martin Thu, 03 Sep 2009 13:33:06 +0000 http://thingthatthinks.com/?p=214#comment-2541 Well, the question "why is it different as log files" is absolutely correct. Maybe microblogging is nothing else than a logging system - but one with collaboration functionality. This makes the difference. I wrote about microblogging adoption reasons in one of the former postings (http://thingthatthinks.com/2009/08/a-full-range-of-reasons-why-to-adopt-microblogging-for-the-enterprise/). There are a lot of reasons. For me, the main point is: with ubimic you could have all use cases on ONE platform. And: in a ubimic scenario where would be standard agents (looking for key words, monitoring the tweets) which you could use for monitoring your "logs". However, if a log-file-like tracking of e-learning content is the only use case, arguments in fact are rare. You need some more use cases (communication between the e-learning participants, communication between lectures, monitoring of other information sources...)! Well, the question “why is it different as log files” is absolutely correct. Maybe microblogging is nothing else than a logging system - but one with collaboration functionality. This makes the difference.

I wrote about microblogging adoption reasons in one of the former postings (http://thingthatthinks.com/2009/08/a-full-range-of-reasons-why-to-adopt-microblogging-for-the-enterprise/). There are a lot of reasons. For me, the main point is: with ubimic you could have all use cases on ONE platform. And: in a ubimic scenario where would be standard agents (looking for key words, monitoring the tweets) which you could use for monitoring your “logs”.

However, if a log-file-like tracking of e-learning content is the only use case, arguments in fact are rare. You need some more use cases (communication between the e-learning participants, communication between lectures, monitoring of other information sources…)!

]]> Von: Anja Lorenz http://thingthatthinks.com/2009/09/ubiquitous-microblogging/#comment-2540 Anja Lorenz Thu, 03 Sep 2009 13:01:21 +0000 http://thingthatthinks.com/?p=214#comment-2540 I agree with you that ubiquitous microblogging could have interesting application areas. I suggested it already for a kind of status information within a learning object lifecycle management. But I did not came to the point why using microblogging would be better than traditional log files. What do you think? Maybe it could be a next step to identify if there are really advantages and new possibilities of ubiquitous microblogging in comparison to log files. I agree with you that ubiquitous microblogging could have interesting application areas. I suggested it already for a kind of status information within a learning object lifecycle management. But I did not came to the point why using microblogging would be better than traditional log files. What do you think?

Maybe it could be a next step to identify if there are really advantages and new possibilities of ubiquitous microblogging in comparison to log files.

]]>